OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT

Find the friction in one workflow.

Map how work moves, quantify where time is lost, and decide what to fix before investing in more technology.

One workflow · $3,950 upfront · Typically 10–15 business days after payment and required materials

View an Illustrative Sample

Request a Qualification Review
One workflowA defined process, from trigger to completion.
$3,950Paid in full after approval, before work begins.
10–15 daysBusiness days after agreement, payment, and required materials.

Is this the right fit?

A recurring problem.
A decision worth making.

Built for operating businesses and organizations with recurring workflows, multiple systems, and enough activity to measure.

  • Work that repeatsA weekly or monthly process with handoffs, systems, or manual steps.
  • Evidence we can examineInterviews and approved exports, reports, screenshots, or process records.
  • Someone ready to actAn owner or operations leader deciding what to fix, automate, or stop funding.
When this assessment is not a fit
  • Curiosity-only AI exploration without a business decision.
  • One-time personal productivity questions.
  • No measurable workflow or usable evidence.
  • A request for full implementation inside the assessment fee.
  • Work that cannot permit any authorized use of external AI tools.

Start with how work actually moves

Find the friction.
Before you fund the fix.

Follow one workflow through the people, systems, and decisions behind it. Establish what is happening before choosing what to change.

A closer look at the work

Make the invisible steps visible.

Where does information get lost? Where does work wait? A workflow map turns a vague operational problem into specific questions to investigate.

  1. 01 / INTAKE

    Receive

    Does the request arrive with the information the team needs?

  2. 02 / HANDLING

    Capture

    Are people copying the same details between tools?

  3. 03 / OWNERSHIP

    Assign

    Is responsibility clear, or does the handoff create a delay?

  4. 04 / FOLLOW-UP

    Update

    How much effort goes into status checks and repeat messages?

Illustrative workflow. Questions to investigate—not client findings.

What we may measure in your workflow
  • Cycle time, staff effort, handoffs, and approval delays.
  • Duplicate entry, system switching, errors, exceptions, and rework.
  • Missed follow-up, service delays, software overlap, and underused tools.
  • Capacity that could be recovered.
  • Data, security, compliance, and implementation dependencies.

No savings or outcomes are guaranteed. Financial ranges depend on the accuracy and completeness of the evidence supplied.

Scope and deliverables

A decision-ready assessment.

We review one clearly defined workflow from trigger to completion. The engagement may include up to three stakeholder interviews and agreed reports, screenshots, approved exports, policies, and process records.

The $3,950 fee is paid in full before work begins. Delivery is generally 10–15 business days after the agreement, payment, and required materials are received.

See the illustrative deliverable
What is outside the assessment scope?

Implementation, custom software, legal advice, accounting advice, engineering, and ongoing operational support are separate services and are not included unless stated in writing.

Your assessment package

From evidence to action.

  1. The current pictureExecutive summary and current-state workflow map.
  2. The evidenceEvidence and assumption register, with bottleneck, duplication, delay, and rework findings.
  3. The prioritiesEstimated financial exposure in ranges and opportunity scoring by impact, confidence, effort, and risk.
  4. The optionsAI, software, and process options where supported by evidence, including dependencies and risk considerations.
  5. The next stepsA prioritized 30/60/90-day roadmap, one findings meeting, and one round of factual corrections.

Scope is confirmed in writing before payment.

Illustrative sample · Fictional scenario

See how an estimate takes shape.

Suppose a fictional service business receives 300 requests a month, each requiring eight minutes of duplicate handling.

300 requests × 8 minutes
= 40 staff hours per month.

If a process change removed 30–50% of that work, it could free 12–20 hours per month. At an illustrative $40–$60 loaded hourly rate, that represents $480–$1,200 of staff capacity.

Capacity is not cash savings. These are invented inputs, not client results or a forecast. Implementation, training, errors, and maintenance costs are excluded.

Review the full fictional example

Assumptions, made visible

Monthly duplicate handling

Assumed baseline40 hours
Potential capacity released12–20 hours

Both bars use the same 40-hour scale. The solid segment shows the 12-hour lower assumption; the striped segment extends the range to 20 hours.

Fictional example only. The 30–50% reduction is an assumption that a real engagement would need to test. No savings or outcomes are guaranteed.

How the engagement works

Five steps.
One focused decision.

A clear sequence from defining the question to setting the next priorities.

  1. 01

    Scope

    Confirm the decision, workflow, people, available evidence, and engagement boundaries.

  2. 02

    Evidence

    Review interviews and agreed materials. Separate verified facts, estimates, assumptions, and missing evidence.

  3. 03

    Quantify

    Estimate time, cost, delay, errors, rework, software overlap, and operational exposure using defensible ranges.

  4. 04

    Prioritize

    Evaluate impact, confidence, effort, dependencies, and risk. Consider AI where it has a credible business use.

  5. 05

    Deliver

    Review the written assessment and 30/60/90-day roadmap in a findings meeting focused on decisions.

Founder-led and evidence-first

Technology supports the work.
People own the judgment.

Anjelica Mendoza, founder of Opesavara, leads the assessment scope and findings review. Recommendations are labeled by evidence strength and practical limits. If the evidence does not support an investment, the report will say so.

AI-assisted. Human-reviewed.

Opesavara uses AI and analytical tools to organize evidence, compare patterns, test assumptions, and draft working materials. Final findings are reviewed by a human and tied back to the engagement evidence.

Confidentiality and use of information

Confidential or sensitive information is handled according to the written agreement, and de-identified information is used where practical. A reasonable mutual nondisclosure agreement can be used when appropriate.

Deliverable rights

The client receives the final deliverable for internal business use. Opesavara retains its pre-existing methods, templates, and general know-how. Any expanded licensing or third-party use must be agreed in writing.

Start with a qualification review

Which workflow needs a closer look?

Send a short description of the recurring problem, the people involved, and the decision you need to make. We confirm your scope and written agreement before requesting payment.

Payment after approval · Vancouver, Washington · Available across the United States

Request a Qualification Review

Approved clients only

Ready to begin your agreed assessment?

Use this secure payment link only after Opesavara has confirmed your scope and both parties have approved the written engagement. The $3,950 fee covers the agreed one-workflow assessment.

Pay for an Approved Assessment

$3,950 paid in full before work begins. Delivery is generally 10–15 business days after the agreement, payment, and required materials are received.

BEFORE WE BEGIN

Questions about the assessment?

Find answers about payment, access, confidentiality, AI, and deliverables on our homepage.

Read the frequently asked questions →